Why it matters in practice
Explanations can support debugging, oversight, communication, and contesting consequential outcomes, but a fluent explanation is not automatically faithful to a model’s operation. Teams should distinguish measured evidence from a generated narrative and test whether the explanation serves its intended audience. Explainability alone does not establish accuracy, fairness, or legal sufficiency.
Example
An analyst compares a feature-attribution report with the model’s recorded inputs before explaining why a particular classification was produced.
Educational note
This definition is general information, not legal advice. It may omit facts that matter to a specific situation and does not establish or guarantee compliance.